To the shock of pretty much no one with an IQ above that of a blobfish, we've now learned the Hillary Clinton's campaign and the DNC funded much of the (ahem) "research" that resulted in the infamous "golden showers" Trump Russian dossier - an even greater work of fiction than Hillary's "What Happened."
This is not a small thing, because the entirely bogus dossier - always and only intended to do political harm to Trump - was then passed on to John McCain, who passed it along to FBI Director (at the time) James Comey, who used it to kick off investigations of Trump's campaign for alleged collusion with Russia.
But the facts are that Hillary likely paid to get faked information from Russian sources, perhaps using some of the money (north of $100 million) that her Foundation got from other Russians who wanted to buy rights to American uranium (and were magically able to do so after Hillary approved the deal). So there's plenty of Russian collusion and interference with our election process, but involving the Clintons, the DNC, and (oh yeah!) Comey, Mueller, John Podesta, the State Department, and the FBI.
In the face of these two titanic scandals, Hillary will no doubt finally get what's coming to her - right?
Wrong. Because most Americans have no idea that these scandals even exist. Hillary's funding of the Russian Dossier is a yuuuge story (to quote President Trump), but when we checked online we couldn't find a single mention of it - or Uranium One - on the websites of CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, or CBS.
In fact, here's the only "scandal" NBC News is reporting:
 |
| Bill Clinton spent more than that on removing stains. |
But thanks to "The Silence of the Shams," the fake news outlets, the American people are being woefully uninformed and misinformed.
While we don't always agree with Trump, maybe it is time for the FCC to start reviewing broadcast licenses to determine if the public interest, rather than special interests, are being served.
I sent this to a friend ~
ReplyDelete1953, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were executed for conspiracy to commit espionage; they passed top secret information concerning the structure of the bomb. They also passed information concerning radar, sonar, and jet propulsion engines. The Rosenbergs claimed they believed no country should have an unfair advantage by being the only country to have an atomic weapon. IMO, The Rosenbergs absolutely deserved the death penalty.
Bill and Hillary Clinton sold out our country and handed over uranium to Russia for big bucks. These two amoral grifters saw dollar signs and handed over our security to a potentially hostile country.
So, my question to you: what’s the difference between the Rosenbergs and the Clintons?
They aren't "playing dumb." I don't know how this bitch gets away with this stuff. The only difference between the Rosenberg's and the Clinton's is Monica and I'll bet that was a freebee.
ReplyDeleteThere's certainly enough out there for a bit of a BBQ, but until they bring her in front of a judge w/ top notch security, well, I'm not holding my breath. Then again, apparently they've annoyed The Trump to where he had to wake up Sessions to get him to lift the block on the FBI mole on the U1 issue... he may be annoyed enough to see this through... I hope THAT guy is in a deep, safe hole, w/ his testimony filed in at least 3 places...
ReplyDeleteShe gets away with it because she lies, the MSM covers for her, the Republicans let the Democrats control the narrative, and because the public is so tired of this shit they have lapsed into brain-dead apathy. Not to mention that the public is generally STUPID!
ReplyDeleteOther than that, what doesn't anyone get?
Must be about time for someone to accidently shoot themself 6 times in the back of the head.
ReplyDeleteAs big as this is sadly, it may well take a revolution to see that justice is done. I hate the thought that my great grand children will have to swim in this morass.
ReplyDeleteThe Clinton machine is still powerful and many-tentacled. That and the Øbama machine are still DEEPLY entrenched within our government, as evidenced by how easily the "Trump-Russo collusion" fantasy grew enough legs to precipitate all kinds of Clinton and Øbama allies being appointed to be judge, jury, and executioner for this administration. I'm HOPING (hope springs eternal...) that the Trump administration has balls (apologies to those without balls...) enough to call all of these bad actors out on their involvement in the REAL scandals, and prosecute them to the full extent allowed by REAL law.
ReplyDeleteThe only other difference is 49-64 years and a dullard electorate, easily mesmerized by letters jammed up next to each other (like ABC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, NBC, et al).
@Bobo the Hobo- The difference between the Rosenbergs and the Clintons are A) a complicit media and B) a trail of bodies.
ReplyDelete@Judi King- I'm afraid you're right. All most people need is to see a laughing Hillary say that the charges against her are "baloney," and they're happy to accept it.
@Thomas Beechler- A long, long time ago I speculated that the Clinton's made an actual deal with the devil. While I'm not usually of a theological bent, it sure seems like the evidence keeps coming in.
@Pete (Detroit)- I'm genuinely worried about the FBI mole who's had the NDA lifted and can now testify. I'm guessing a LOT of people don't want that to happen, and they play rough.
@Emmentaler Limburger- Well put. And I notice on Facebook this morning, the News Feed is showing a story from NBC News quoting Hillary as saying that the Trump-Russia investigation is real. Welcome to the pinheaded fantasy world of shiny objects and outright lies.
@Jim Irre- Nicely put!
@Geoff King- Well, when you're cleaning your automatic assault revolver, things just happen.
@Fred Ciampi- I think as long as the Clintons (and their cronies) walk free, we can assume the swamp isn't drained.
I found it interesting that neither the DNC nor Clinton knew about this although they had spend Millions, according to one source and Schultz (head of DNC at the time) knew nothing, Clinton knew nothing, her lawyer knew nothing and neither Podesta knew nothing.
ReplyDeleteHowever, although none knew nothing, all went balls to the wall to paint President Trump with this ludicrous sham. Then, they paid Millions for this? How much does a work of fiction cost? We have Rapist Clinton transferring the rocket science from the state department to the commerce department so he could sell it to the Chinese whose rockets kept exploding and could not get sheit to orbit. The Sargent Schultz defense is alive and well.
A nation of laws, or a nation of men. Which shall it be, America?
ReplyDeleteThe Rosenbergs weren't trying for personal gain, despite their rotten, traitorous, commie hearts. They said they were working for what they saw as a greater good (they were wrong on that one, too) not just profit.
ReplyDeleteThe Clinton Crime Family Foundation, on the other hand, looks for little beyond personal gain.
To those of you hoping that the Trump administration (or anyone else) will do anything to hold accountable those parties responsible for the Fusion GPS dossier, the Uranium One scandal, and any other wrongdoing by our political 'betters,' I refer you to this story: "Trump DOJ settles lawsuits over Tea Party targeting by Obama IRS."
ReplyDeleteNo one lost their job, no one was indicted, no one suffered any meaningful punishment for the blatant weaponization of the IRS. Similarly, it is highly doubtful that there will be any significant repercussions from the dossier/uranium revelations. In fact, all the recent disclosures do is confirm that the FBI has become useless as a law enforcement agency, at least when it comes to politically-tinged cases.
As for the MSM's role in all this, well, A.F. Branco says it better in one picture than I could with 1,000 words.
The funny part is that we've basically known this for how long? Over a year and a half? The MSM ignored it then when it was simple connect-the-dots. So there's little reason to expect them to pay attention now that the dots have been connected for them.
ReplyDeleteSuch is a great measure of the degree of the media's bias; They're all exorcised over barely 6-figures spent on Facebook ads, while blithely indifferent to the hundreds of millions the Russians funneled to the Clinton's personal coffer's through Bill's speech-making and their phony foundation.
The other thing not to forget is that this is, in fact, an Obama scandal: This corruption all happened under the supposedly "scandal free" Obama administration. This was his State Department, his Department of Justice knew about it, as did his FBI. And they were threatening anybody involved from going public with any of it. In effect, Hillary Clinton handed this scam over to the Obama Administration, when then unleashed the apparatus of state to work against her political opponent. Obama could have put the brakes on this at any time. He didn't. Why?
It's also a good measure of the inherent dishonesty and partisanship of "the deep state"; All these agencies involved, and probably countless others were able to keep their lips zipped on all of this for years. Compare that to the sieve these agencies became the moment that Trump became President. Perhaps the saddest aspect is what this has done to the reputation of the FBI, supposedly the gold standard of impartial investigation in the US. Now they look no more impartial and honest than the IRS.
I'm not a fan of the idea of the idea of the government taking action against broadcasters over content, as mediocre as it is, because that actually would be "fascism"; the kind that Progressives insists that Trump represents. I'd rather see the alphabets go bankrupt because we're no longer interested in their crappy product. CNN's rating continue to fall below those of Grumpy Cat. Sports fans are getting over ESPN & the NFL. Broadcast news has become a sad parody of itself. They're finishing themselves off without the government's help.
Playing Devil's Advocate here: investigating the alleged Russian connection to Trump carried a high risk that the Uranium1 deal, as well as the Dossier Caper would receive the kind of scrutiny it's now getting. I believe that the Podesta crowd is as crooked as a pail of snakes but I didn't think they were stupid enough to not see this risk. Why did they open this particular can of worms? Seems a LOT dumber than I give them credit for being.
ReplyDeleteMaybe they've been lulled into a false sense of security by a compliant/complicit media but that seems too facile to me. I think they're too smart and knowing to count on that kind of support as bullet-proof protection. After all, all of the Uranium1 stuff has been floating around for over a year, reported on - accurately, apparently - by a number of outlets. Why is MSM picking it up NOW?
Might there be a civil war going on w/in the Democrat party? And this is a way to clear away the Clinton faction? Perhaps b/c they took the party down in flames last year and, through their continued presence and influence, will prevent any recovery any time soon? B/c of the embarrassment they've caused for all Democrats and fellow travelers? Just thinking out loud. Am I TOO paranoid?
Oh, in case you are having trouble deciding what or who you should dress up as for Halloween, might I suggest using this handy chart:
ReplyDeleteHow privileged are you?
It's actually a chart designed by Progressive SJWs to shame you based upon "privilege", but I've found it incredibly useful as a way to mathematically quantify Progressive values, or things they love and hate.
But it's got other unintended uses as well. If you really want to piss off Progressives next Tuesday, pick a costume based upon the lowers possible score achieved from this chart. I'm thinking of dressing as an intersex, gay, transexual Muslim from the Middle East who is both blind and retarded, and homeless.
@Jack Colby: Interesting points. But remember, Hillary was "inevitable", going back as far as 2008. (I had certainly assumed this) They didn't see any unmanageable risk for the simple reasons that they knew Obama wasn't going to act, the media wasn't going to act, and Hillary was going to win and consolidate even more power, seeing to it that in the future, absolutely nobody else was going to act. (Hey Facebook & Twitter, those are nice businesses you have there. It would be a shame if we decided to act in the name of "national security" and...) That someone other than Hillary might win, especially someone like Trump was simply unfathomable.
There's no question that there's a civil war going on within the Democratic Party, especially in the wake of the most undemocratic Clintons who clearly are not yet willing to go away. It ranges from the "moderate" relics of the old DLC days though the Sandernistas to the outright Marxists. My Progressive friends like posting almost daily about the supposed discord of the GOP, but nothing compares to the disintegration that's been going on in the Democrat party for years now.
I do not know the guy's name who is now free to testify on the Uranium One thing, but Geoff hit the nail on the head. This person better be hidden in Cheyenne Mountain, deep in a concrete bunker with about 5,000 guards from rural Texas, armed to the teeth with rocket launchers, grenades and automatic weapons (and don't forget the automatic ammo!).
ReplyDeleteConcerning the MSM's reluctance to notice anything beyond Trump, Trump, Trump... When cornered, they can turn on you like a trapped badger. If faced with the choice of getting egg on their faces or throwing Shrillay under the bus, they could very well turn on the old hag. Maybe wishful thinking on my part....
@John the Econ: "Obama could have put the brakes on this at any time. He didn't. Why?"
ReplyDeleteI've thought about this a lot lately. He had to have been cut in.
What a wonderful world it would be if the demonRatz and the media had to report these as cash political donations and advertising to the IRS instead of calling it the evening "news"......
ReplyDelete